Practice

Challenging a tax authority decision

A decision has already been issued following the audit, but it can and should be contested, from a pre-trial appeal through to the commercial court.

Service

What the service includes

A tax authority decision is not final, even once the audit is over. A pre-trial appeal to the higher tax authority is a mandatory step before going to court, and it is often at this stage that part of the claims is dropped.

If the pre-trial appeal brings no result, we take the case to the commercial (arbitrazh) court. Our experience includes the cancellation of additional assessments worth tens of millions of roubles after successfully challenging the results of field tax audits.

We also assess whether to challenge the decision as a whole or only certain episodes: sometimes it is better to accept the undisputed assessments and concentrate resources on the points that are genuinely contestable. In parallel we deal with suspension of the decision: while an appeal is pending, collection may continue unless a separate application for interim measures is filed. This approach saves the client’s resources and improves the chances of success on the key episodes.

What the service includes:

Pre-trial appeal to the regional tax office Challenging additional assessments in court Challenging penalties and late-payment interest Suspending enforcement of the decision Appealing a refusal of tax deductions
Clients

Who it is for

The situations clients most often bring to us on this topic.

Companies with an audit decision whose appeal deadline is about to expire Businesses where bailiffs have already started collection under the decision Companies that partly agree with the assessments in the audit report Executives preparing an appeal to the higher authority
Service

How we work

A fixed fee and a clear plan of action, agreed before work begins. The timeframes below are indicative and depend on the complexity of the case.

I

Review of the judgment

We study the tax authority’s decision and the audit materials to find genuine grounds for cancellation. Timeframe: 2-5 days.

II

Pre-trial appeal

We prepare and file the appeal with the higher tax authority, a mandatory step before going to court. Timeframe: 1 month to file the appeal with the regional tax office.

III

Court challenge

If the pre-trial appeal is refused, we go to the commercial court with a refined legal position. Timeframe: 3-12 months in court.

IV

Enforcement of the court decision

We secure the actual cancellation of the assessment or the refund of amounts wrongly collected. Timeframe: 1-2 months.

Documents

What you will need at the start

We confirm the exact list for your situation at the consultation. This is a guide so that you arrive at the first meeting prepared.

Tax authority decision Audit report Objections filed earlier (if any) Documents refuting the inspectorate’s findings
Practice

Key figures

Experience in this practice area specifically, not in practice as a whole.

45% of decisions cancelled in part or in full Share of challenged decisions where the additional assessments were reduced or cancelled.
3 instances on average before a result Pre-trial appeal, first-instance court and appeal: the standard path in contested cases.
30 days to file an appeal That is the time a company has to challenge a decision that has not yet taken effect.
RUB 25 million average amount in dispute Typical size of additional assessments in cases that reach the higher tax authority.
90% of applications for interim measures granted Share of cases where collection was successfully suspended while the appeal is pending.
18 sector-specific court precedents We use them in our arguments when preparing appeals and statements of claim in tax disputes.
Practice

Common mistakes

Rushing straight to court. A company applies directly to the commercial court, skipping the mandatory appeal to the higher tax authority. The court then refuses to hear the application on the merits, and the time for a real defence is lost.

An appeal without case law. The appeal against the decision is drafted in-house and contains only general objections, with no references to specific provisions of the Tax Code or to court practice. The higher authority rejects it on formal grounds, and the weak argumentation carries over into the court stage.

Staffing problems as the reason for a missed deadline. An organisation explains a missed appeal deadline by the absence of an in-house lawyer or accountant when the decision was received. Courts do not accept such reasons as valid, unlike illness or emergencies, and the right to appeal is lost.

Result

What you get

An appeal with a full evidence base. An appeal supported by documents and references to case law is filed with the higher tax authority.

Debt collection suspended. Enforcement of the decision is suspended for the duration of the appeal, and no funds are written off from your accounts.

A clear fallback plan. If the pre-trial appeal produces no result, the claim materials for the commercial court are ready.

A reduced amount or a cancelled decision. The company receives a revised decision with reduced assessments, or a court ruling cancelling them.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Is it mandatory to appeal first to the higher tax authority?+

Yes. This is a mandatory pre-trial procedure for most tax disputes, and without it the court will not accept the claim.

Can enforcement of the decision be suspended while the appeal is pending?+

Yes. Under certain conditions it is possible to obtain a suspension of collection until the dispute has been heard.

How long does a full challenge to the decision take?+

From a few months (pre-trial appeal only) to a year or more if the case goes to court and appeal.

Can a decision be challenged if the tax has already been paid?+

Yes. If the challenge succeeds, overpaid amounts are refunded with interest.

Does an appeal suspend collection of the additionally assessed taxes?+

If the decision is appealed to the higher authority before it takes effect, collection is suspended until the appeal is heard. An appeal against a decision that has already taken effect gives no such automatic stay.

Can only certain episodes of the assessment be challenged, rather than the whole decision?+

Yes, the law permits a partial challenge, and this is often the more effective strategy where some of the inspectorate’s findings are well founded and others are clearly open to dispute.