When a refusal is lawful and when it is not
An insurer almost never says outright that it does not want to pay. The letter will give a formal reason: you notified it late, a document is missing, or its staff expert decided that the dent on the door “does not match the circumstances of the accident”. Sometimes the reason is genuine. But a noticeable share of refusals rest on the calculation that the person will not check anything.
There are also honest refusals that are pointless to contest. The most common example: the at-fault driver had no OSAGO policy. In that case your own insurer really is not involved, and the claim is brought against the at-fault driver, usually through the courts.
More often than an outright refusal, something else happens. The money arrives, but it covers barely half the repair. The insurer calculates the loss under the Unified Methodology of the Bank of Russia, with deduction for wear of parts, and for a cash payment that is lawful. However, for a passenger car owned by an individual and registered in Russia, the main form of compensation since 2017 is not money but repair at a workshop with which the insurer has a contract. The insurer may replace repair with a cash payment only in cases expressly listed in the law, or with your written consent. If it transferred money on its own without issuing a repair referral, the Supreme Court in such cases repeatedly sides with the owner: the insurer must pay the cost of repair without deduction for wear, which is usually noticeably more.
The European protocol (accident report without the traffic police) is a story of its own. If the accident was recorded without the traffic police, the insurer readily seizes on the diagram and illegible entries in the notification form. What helps is photographs from different angles, dashcam footage and witnesses’ phone numbers, collected at the scene rather than a week later.
Read next
The dispute route: claim letter, Ombudsman, court
You have to start with a written claim to your own insurer. A call to the hotline does not count as a claim, even if the manager noted everything down. You need a document stating the claim number, demanding an additional payment or a review of the refusal and, if you already have one, attaching an independent expert report. You can send it through the insurer’s online account or by registered letter with an inventory of contents, so that you can later prove the date. The insurer has 15 working days to respond if the claim was submitted electronically on the standard form no later than 180 days after the breach. In all other cases the period is 30 days.
No reply, or not satisfied with it? Then go to the Financial Ombudsman. Since 1 June 2019 an individual cannot sue an insurer under OSAGO without going through the Ombudsman first, and the amount in dispute makes no difference. Filing is free, either through the personal account on the service’s website or by post. The complaint is considered within 15 working days, and if an expert examination is ordered, the period is extended by up to 10 more. The service orders the examination at its own expense, and this is the main benefit of the procedure: you obtain an opinion that was not written by the insurer’s expert.
The Ombudsman’s decision takes effect 10 working days after signing, and the insurer must comply with it in the same way as with a court judgment. If it fails to comply on time, the court, on your claim, will add a penalty of half the amount awarded.
The case reaches court when one of the parties is dissatisfied with the decision. The consumer has 30 days to sue after the decision takes effect, the insurer has 10 working days. People often forget about the second option. Winning before the Ombudsman is not yet money in your account: the insurer may challenge the decision and ask the court to suspend its enforcement. So keep your documents, expert report and correspondence ready, rather than hunting for them when the summons arrives.
Deadlines and late-payment penalties: where the insurer takes the risk
The key figure in this dispute is 20 calendar days. That is how long, under paragraph 21 of Article 12 of Federal Law No. 40-FZ, the insurer has to pay, issue a repair referral or send a reasoned refusal. Non-working public holidays are not counted. The clock runs from the day the insurer received the full set of documents, so keep the inventory and the date of filing.
If the insurer is late by even a day, a penalty starts to accrue: 1% of the compensation due for each day of delay. It adds up quickly. Say the underpayment is RUB 150,000. That is RUB 1,500 a day and about RUB 90,000 over two months. The overall cap on the penalty for damage to a vehicle is RUB 400,000. It is recovered by the same route, through a claim letter and the Ombudsman, but in the final amount it often weighs no less than the underpayment itself.
And one more point that removes a common fear: “while I wait for a reply, I will miss the deadline”. You can claim money under OSAGO within three years, and while your complaint is with the Financial Ombudsman, that period does not run. Nobody takes away your time for the pre-trial procedure.
What if you have CASCO insurance?
OSAGO does not protect your car but the person to whom you caused harm. CASCO is bought voluntarily and covers your own vehicle, and not only after an accident: theft, a falling tree, hail. CASCO disputes also go through the Financial Ombudsman, but only if the claim is no more than RUB 500,000. For larger claims you can go straight to court.
Under CASCO, the insurer less often disputes the fact of payment and more often its amount. It relies on the insurance rules: hidden damage, a risk not on the list, breach of storage conditions. It is best to read those rules before an accident. Still, an unfavourable clause is not a death sentence: courts regard some such terms as infringing consumer rights and do not apply them.
Mistakes that lose the dispute
The most expensive mistake happens before the dispute even begins. The insurer offers to sign an agreement on the payment amount, the person signs without reading, and it contains a line saying they have no further claims. After that, recovering an additional payment is almost impossible, and an expert report will no longer help.
The second most common story is more frustrating, because the right to the money has not gone anywhere. After receiving a refusal, the person goes straight to court. The court returns the claim or leaves it without consideration, because there was neither a claim letter nor an Ombudsman complaint, and a month is lost.
Sometimes a claim was supposedly made, but by phone or in an app chat without confirmation. There is then nothing to prove the date of the request, and both the deadlines and the penalty depend on it. And finally, arguing about the amount relying only on the insurer’s own estimate is almost pointless. It was not calculated in your interests, and without your own expert report a dispute over money turns into a clash of opinions.
When you need a lawyer
A dispute over an additional payment of 30 or 40 thousand roubles can quite well be handled on your own. A claim letter and an Ombudsman complaint can be written without legal training, and templates are available on the service’s website. It makes sense to bring in a lawyer when hundreds of thousands are at stake, when people were injured in the accident, when the insurer is already appealing the Ombudsman’s decision, or when it insists that the event is not an insured one at all.
In such cases the outcome is often decided in the first two weeks after the accident: which expert report was ordered, what was captured at the scene, how the claim was worded. A weak claim can be fixed later, but it takes longer and costs more. We record the cost and the work plan for the case in writing before we start.
Frequently asked questions
Can I sue the insurer straight away?+
No. First a written claim to the insurer, then the Financial Ombudsman. A claim filed without these steps will be returned by the court or left without consideration.
How long do I wait for the Financial Ombudsman’s decision?+
15 working days from the moment the complaint is passed to the Ombudsman, and up to 10 more working days if an expert examination is ordered. The limitation period does not run during this time.
The insurer paid money instead of arranging repair. Is that lawful?+
Only in cases expressly named in the law, or with your written consent. If you did not consent, you can demand the cost of repair without deduction for wear, and the courts uphold such claims.
The Financial Ombudsman ruled in my favour. Will the money definitely arrive?+
The decision is binding on the insurer, but it has 10 working days after the decision takes effect to challenge it in court. If it neither challenges nor pays, the court will recover, on top, a penalty of half the amount awarded.
Need an assessment of your situation?+
Send us a request: an insurance disputes lawyer will review the documents, the expert report and the correspondence with the insurer and tell you what you can realistically expect in your case.